Skip to content

Landlords face more (in)security deposit uncertainty

October 16, 2015


pro portrait-crop

Peter Vickery, Esq.

My amicus brief for the statewide organization is the subject of a news story in today’s BusinessWest magazine. The case concerns the complex law surrounding security deposits.

Does the law really say that a landlord’s security-deposit mistake is a defense that allows the tenant to retain possession even after failing to pay rent? I don’t think so. To learn why, check out the article in BusinessWest.

But if the Supreme Judicial Court agrees with the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, which represents the tenant, landlords will be even more reluctant to accept security deposits so (facing greater insecurity) will likely spread the risk through higher rents.

No comments yet

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: